Ray Nagin's Speech: Effective or Ineffective leadership

Introduction: After the incident of Hurricane Katrina that destroyed the American Gulf, the mayor of new-fangled siege of Orleans quill Nagin was questioned and criticized by more whether he was an telling draw or not and whether he dealt with the emergency successfully or not. Many of his raft axiom that Nagins speech was an example of an effective leadership while others didnt retain with that and refused the way he dealt with the agency as a totally. In this paper, I disagree with either the people that said: Ray Nagin was an effective leader. My opinion was in the main based on the analysis of his personal traits that I perceive from his interview in the context of our book. Analysis: In chapter 1, Selznick said that the leaders function is to delineate the ends of group existence, to design an enterprise distinctively adapted to these ends, and to livelihood in line that the design becomes a living truth. Also, studying the potence of a leader, more emphasis should be located on the come forwardcomes of the total system, including the fulfillment of expectations held by followers. In the parapraxis of Katrina, Nagin failed to cleave control of the situation. He didnt succeed in support his people and evacuating them when he was given the 2 days notice.

In chapter 3, Stogdill identified fewer personal traits that a leader should possess. I believe Nagin lacked few of these traits. He didnt have enough qualification to deal with the whole situation. The incident was difficult on everybody out there, but as a leader on behalf of New Orleans, he was not able to digest control of things r edden on himself. He did not use his verbal ! ease in the decorous manner. He used improper words all along the speech. He also lacked knowledge of things connect to... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay