Civil War

fighttime is a time when propaganda and nationalism thrive, and the Ameri arse Civil state of war was not an exception to this generalization. Many authors wrote their own offices of the war into stories both during or after the war, and many did not share the patriot descry of war as glorious. Different authors chose to book of facts this effect in different ways. Two authors that we studied in this class, Samuel Clemens and Stephen Crane, chose to spread over their own views of the war through pieces that incorporate elements of literary chaff. In this paper, I plan to show how Clemens and Crane employ elements of literary jeering in order to present a view of war as anything but glorious. To begin, it is important to define satire as it will be utilise in this paper. hit to Dictionary.com, a satire is a literary work in which human vice or folly is attacked through caustic remark, derision, or wit. This paper will focus primarily on both elements of this definition: folly and irony. Folly, as used in this paper, is outlined as lack of understanding or sense (Dictionary.com). chaff has two definitions as relevant to this paper.

The first definition of irony is an outcome of events contrary to what was, or might have been, anticipate, and the sulphur is the indirect presentation of a contradiction between an typeface and the context in which it occurs (Dictionary.com). By combining these definitions, one tin arrive at the meaning of satire as it is used in this paper: a satire is a literary device used to attack human folly by means of either presenting the r eader with an outcome that is the opposite o! f what was pass judgment or through the indirect presentation of a contradiction between an expression and the context in which it occurs.If you want to deliver out a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay